Prediction of Magdalena Feistel vs Jeri Ingram Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Feistel vs J. Ingram

Magdalena Feistel

POL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

192

Best Rank

173

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Jeri Ingram

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

192

Best Rank

173

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Feistel 1 - 0 Ingram

They have played 2 sets in total, with Magdalena Feistel winning 2 and Jeri Ingram winning 0. The last match between Magdalena Feistel and Jeri Ingram was at the ITF San Luis Potosi, 19-10-1992, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Magdalena Feistel getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Feistel	1
Ingram	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF San Luis Potosi(10-19-92)

Stats

Magdalena Feistel

Jeri Ingram

M. Feistel vs J. Ingram H2H Profile

M. Feistel	Stats	J. Ingram
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.52% (125-113)	Career Total W/L	54.25% (115-97)
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Feistel vs J. Ingram Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Magdalena Feistel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jeri Ingram has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Magdalena Feistel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jeri Ingram has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Magdalena Feistel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jeri Ingram has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Magdalena Feistel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jeri Ingram winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Magdalena Feistel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 65/57), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 30/37). Jeri Ingram has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 17/11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/3).
Player level: In the last year, Magdalena Feistel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jeri Ingram has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Magdalena Feistel winning 1 times and Jeri Ingram being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Magdalena Feistel winning 2 and Jeri Ingram winning 0.
The last match between Magdalena Feistel and Jeri Ingram was at the ITF San Luis Potosi, 19-10-1992, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Magdalena Feistel getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Magdalena Feistel has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jeri Ingram has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Magdalena Feistel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jeri Ingram has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Magdalena Feistel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jeri Ingram has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Magdalena Feistel vs Jeri Ingram Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Feistel vs J. Ingram H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Feistel	Stats	J. Ingram
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Feistel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Salzburg 25K - 09-12-1996
R3 Veronika MartinekV. Martinek	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Bad Gogging 25K - 11-11-1996
R4 Maja Zivec SkuljM. Zivec	L	7-6 6-7 6-2	Stats
R3 Claudia PorwikC. Porwik	W	7-5 7-6	Stats
Stockholm 25K - 28-10-1996
R3 Radka PelikanovaR. Pelikanova	W	6-3 3-6 6-4	Stats
R4 Jana PospisilovaJ. Pospisilova	L	3-6 6-4 7-5	Stats

View All

J. Ingram Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Canadian Indoor - 21-10-1996
Q2 Haruka InoueH. Inoue	L	6-4 5-7 6-1	Stats
R3 Katrina AdamsK. Adams	L	7-6 6-3	Stats
Puerto Vallarta 25K - 30-09-1996
R3 Linda SentisL. Sentis	L	7-6 6-0	Stats
US Open - 26-08-1996
Q1 Bettina FulcoB. Fulco	L	6-2 4-6 7-5	Stats
Easton 10K - 08-07-1996
R3 Kristin OsmondK. Osmond	W	7-6 7-6	Stats

View All

M. Feistel vs J. Ingram Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Feistel	Stats	J. Ingram
52.52% (125/113)	YTD Win/Loss	54.25% (115/97)
52.11% (284/261)	Sets Win/Loss	52.27% (242/221)
51.37% (2526/2391)	Games Win/Loss	51.47% (2129/2007)
44.78% (30/37)	Hard Win/Loss	56.60% (90/69)
53.28% (65/57)	Clay Win/Loss	60.71% (17/11)
66.67% (24/12)	Indoor Hard W/L	12.50% (1/7)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	40.00% (2/3)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
429.83	Average Opponent Rank	540.18
0.00% (0/1)	Slam W/L	50.00% (4/4)
42.11% (8/11)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
58.60% (92/65)	Challenger W/L	59.82% (67/45)
42.86% (3/4)	Futures W/L	41.67% (5/7)
53% (123/234)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (111/204)
42% (11/26)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	38% (10/26)
52% (39/75)	Deciding Set Win %	64% (30/47)
83% (124/103)	1st Set Won, Won Match	92% (101/93)
17% (124/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	7% (101/7)
19% (112/21)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (108/18)